Who publishes this, and why you can check it

Written and maintained by Lars. It is not a team and not a company blog — one person reading pricing pages and writing down what they say.

Published by Congoods, a Dutch sole proprietorship registered with the Chamber of Commerce under KvK 76877213. That register is public, so there is a real, traceable person behind everything here — not an anonymous site.

Corrections, disagreements and right-of-reply requests go to hello@supabuz.com.

Every per-message rate comes from Meta's own WhatsApp Business Platform rate card, effective 2026-07-01. The original file is kept in this site's source repository rather than retyped, so the figures can be traced to the document they came from.

Provider fees come from each provider's own public pricing page, with the date it was read. Where a provider does not disclose something, we record that it does not disclose it. A stated “not publicly disclosed” is more useful than a confident guess, and the absence is itself a finding.

We do not copy figures from other comparison sites, even accurate ones. Published rates go stale, get quoted for the wrong country, or get truncated in search results until they say something their author never wrote. Going back to the source is the only way to know which you are looking at.

Category before price. A provider selling API access with no interface is not an alternative to one selling a full inbox with seats included. They are never ranked against each other as though you were choosing between them.

Normalised per seat. A subscription that includes ten users is divided by ten before it is compared with anything. Per seat is necessary but not sufficient, so what the seat actually buys is stated alongside it — and where a provider bills per conversation or per active contact instead, we say so rather than forcing a per-seat number onto it.

Sometimes the answer is to stay put. Switching provider means migrating a number, getting templates re-approved and retraining a team. Where the arithmetic says that is not worth it, the site says so.

1. Rankings and recommendations come from the data and from what you enter. Commission is not an input to the sort order.
2. Where the provider that fits has no affiliate programme, it is still the one we point you at. As it stands we earn nothing from 360dialog, and it is still what the site recommends to businesses that do not need the software layer — that is the policy working, not a favour to them.
3. Every outbound link is labelled affiliate or not, inline, at the link itself.
4. No provider pays for placement or ranking. If sponsorship ever happens, it will be labelled as sponsorship and kept structurally outside the ranking logic.

The October 2026 rates are not published yet. Meta publishes them on 1 September 2026. Until then every post-October figure here is an estimate applying today's utility rate, which is Meta's stated basis for the change but not a number it has confirmed.

Most providers are not verified yet. A directory of the wider market is being built, but a provider only appears with a claim attached once that claim has been read at its own source. That is slow on purpose.

Negotiated pricing is invisible. Enterprise contracts are not public, so everything here reflects public list prices. If you are large enough to negotiate, your real numbers will be better than these.

Anything published here that turns out to be wrong gets corrected on the page it appeared on, dated, and listed below with what changed and why. Nothing is quietly edited away.

The list is empty because this site is new and nothing has needed correcting yet. It is here so that the first time something does, there is already an obvious place for it — and so you can check later whether it was used.

If you work for a provider and something here is wrong or out of date, write to hello@supabuz.com and point at the page that shows it. We check it, update it, and log the correction above with the date.

That is the whole process. There is no fee, no partnership required, and correcting a fact does not change where a provider ranks — the ranking follows the corrected data, wherever it lands.